Restoring the Sacred

Monday, March 26, 2018

Film discussion: "The Price of Peace"




Recorded on March 22, 2018 
Leading up to the onset of World War II, western democracies like Britain and France viewed a policy of appeasement toward Germany as the path of wisdom and restraint. It seemed prudent to make concessions to aggressors if it meant avoiding a bloody war. When Nazi Germany rearmed the Rhineland, annexed Austria, and seized an area of Czechoslovakia, the British and French response came in the form of paper: the Munich Agreement, which conceded these territories to Germany under the condition they make no land grabs. British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain declared to a cheering crowd that the agreement meant “peace for our time.” 
Concessions often bring about peace in the short term, defusing tensions for a while… but the aggressor’s initial demands are not forgotten and, in fact, they are often bolstered by newfound doubts about their enemies’ resolve. As such, a greater conflict ensues. This was the case in 1939 when Germany broke the still-new Munich Agreement and invaded Poland, starting World War II. 
The lesson of deterrence is one which is hard-learned time and time again. Hoover Institution Research Fellow Kiron Skinner and Claudia Rosett sit down for a discussion moderated by Mary Kissel about the film "The Price of Peace" and lessons that can be drawn from it.